Sunday, July 10, 2016

Digital Technology and the New Zealand Curriculum

On the week that I finished my last Mindlab assignment the Ministry of Education announced formal changes to the New Zealand curriculum that would see digital technologies recognised as core curriculum. I glowed with satisfaction for a brief time at feeling ahead of the game, or at least on the game given the intensive professional development that I had received over the last six months in leadership, collaboration and change alongside digital technologies. The glow faded rapidly as I read more about this announcement.

"Digital technology will be formally made part of the New Zealand Curriculum - the first change since 2007.
Education Minister Hekia Parata said the change would prepare school students for a future in which "digital fluency" would be critial.
The change is a recommendation of the Government's science and society strategic plan "A Nation of Curious Minds".
"The information technology sector is one of the fastest growing sectors in New Zealand, with a demand for skilled graduates. This step will support young people to develop skills, confidence and interest in digital technologies," Ms Parata said.
Schools can already teach digital technologies, it has now been formalised as part of the curriculum.
Consultation will be held until the end of the year, to design new curriculum content, with changes fully integrated into the New Zealand Curriculum for next year." (Jones, 2016)
The Herald article by Jones sees the Minister of Education, Hekia Parata acknowledge the critical place of digital fluency for our children while in Wellington at the ITx Conference Ian McCrae, Ian Taylor and Frances Valintine (founder of Mindlab) released an open letter criticising the scope of changes to the digital technology curriculum, the time frame and the linking of digital technology with vocational subjects. They stated that '.. our children will continue to be educationally disadvantaged and underskilled for high paying tech jobs." (The Herald, 5-7-16)
Duncan Garner goes on to describe New Zealand as having 'an analogue education in a digital world'.

 The glow fades faster. It appears that the decision to include digital technology as a strand within the current technology curriculum is a bitter pill to swallow for many who are passionate about providing New Zealand students with a quality digital technology education. The source of outrage is the failure to provide digital technology with the status of a core subject or discipline like maths. Underpinning this is a value system that places subjects on a hierarchy with maths at the top and vocational subjects such as sewing, cooking and woodwork down the bottom in terms of status. This is dinosaur thinking surely? I have always been outraged over the artificial status given to different curriculum areas that demean one subject at the expense of elevating another. 
Digital fluency is just as important as being fed, clothed and housed. They are all fundamental to successful lives. 

Garner, D. (2016) http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/81884876/duncan-garner-an-analogue-education-system-in-a-digital-world, Retrieved 11th July, 2016
Jones, N. (2016) http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11668961,Retrieved 11th July 2016
Pullar-Strecker, T. (2016) http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/81963241/row-over-curriculum-dominates-opening-of-tech-conference Retrieved 11th July, 2016.



Sunday, July 3, 2016

APC. Changes in Practice

APC. 8 Changes in Practice
Reflect on your personal 32 week learning journey through the whole postgraduate programme and provide a critical discussion of two key changes in your own research informed practice in relation to the Practising Teacher Criteria (PTC) in e-learning.
“...reflective practice is viewed as a means by which practitioners can develop a greater level of self-awareness about the nature and impact of their performance, an awareness that creates opportunities for professional growth and development.” (Osterman and Kottkamp, 1993, p 2).

In my role as a Resource Teacher of Learning and Behaviour (RTLB), I was fortunate to engage in training with reflective practice that had its focus on improved outcomes for students. One of the key words in the above quote is ‘awareness’ and it is this critical part of the reflective process that the Mindlab journey has gifted me in so many different areas, awareness. 

 Fig 1. The Four Stages of Competence by Noel Burch (Wikipedia)
In any part of reflection the key aspect is awareness. There needs to be a trigger moment of dissonance to move from unconscious incompetence to conscious incompetence. Video can be a powerful trigger for that movement to occur. In so very many ways my learning journey through Mindlab has been a great deal of time out of my comfort zone from collaborative assignments to blog posts. I have a Masters in Educational Leadership and I have become comfortable with written assignments over the years and this course has meant learning to create videos and collaborate on assignments. I loved the practical team activities in the first 16 weeks but did find collaborative assignments challenging for a raft of reasons not least because at the time we were writing the assignment I was travelling in Hong Kong and China – google drive, shared folders and google doc were great and so were the skype conversations that took place!
 I created a matrix of all the criteria and I was easily able to identify aspects of my Mindlab journey  and my professional practice that related to every criteria. Selecting just two changes in relation to the Practising Teacher Criteria was a major challenge. The two key changes in my practice that I will focus on are ones that are in the early stages and I believe they will develop and become fundamental and critical parts of my professional practice. Both of these changes relate to the following criteria:
Criteria 4: Demonstrate commitment to ongoing professional learning and development of professional personal practice.
Criteria 7: Promote a collaborative, inclusive, and supportive learning environment.
The first change relates to the use of video in my practice and the second is my professional inquiry of exploring the use of google doc to increase collaboration and inclusion in my practice.
1.     The use of video for:
- collaborative reflection for my own professional development
- in class observations and collaborative reflection with teachers to reflect on and improve practice
- to teach in a flipped practice model     eg How to do a ten minute unassisted writing sample,     How   to do a KLST-2 oral language assessment, Implementing co-operative structures in junior classes to support oral language
The implementation of this has meant learning how to use imovie and how to facilitate a collaborative reflection process that promotes agency and mana for all parties. I have role modelled this with video’s of my own practice and I have started to create short one- two minute video reflections on practice to use in my professional portfolio. They are rather raw and there is plenty of room for improvement! One of change aspects has been simply getting past the cringe factor of seeing myself on film. I have not been exempt from  “… a squirmy feeling of vulnerability…” (Canning, 1991, p. 21) in shared reflection and viewing myself on screen although I note that younger teachers living in a world of Instagram and ‘selfies’ find this less of an issue.


I have a small film study group and we are all working to support each other in our skills with editing and producing quality video for professional purposes. The teachers that I have worked through using video with collaborative reflection have all found it to be extremely valuable and after the first instance they have recommended this for their colleagues. I intend to continue to extend my skill set and become fluent  in creating video for teaching, reflection and evidence of practice. I have been taking video clips of case work and included this as part of informed consent at the entry phase of my case work.
During the course and the collaborative work of the Literature Review assignment it was illuminating to note that video "...is worth at least a thousand words, and we believe that no leacture or textbook can come close to conveying the practice as well as the dynamics of a video model of exemplary classroom instruction" (Dieker, Lan, Allsopp, O'Brien, Butler, Kyger, Lovin and Fenty, 2009, p 184). I have been able to share parts of the literature research in my work with teachers and that has been satisfying to be able to link my practice to evidence based research.  
  1. The use of google doc functions:
-        Shared documents with transparent access such as shared case log for ease of communication and transparency, no need to double up on written notes then typing as notes are typed straight into google doc on phone, ipad or laptop
-        Increased collaboration in planning for individual education plans and behaviour plans with simultaneous participation of teacher, SENCO (Special Education Needs Co-ordinator) and school management.
-        I have established a google site portfolio for Teacher Registration, reflection and appraisal.
The increased collaboration and partnership with teachers and parents has seen an increase in  co-operation and fidelity in implementing interventions between home and school in behaviour cases. It would be fantastic if I could research this further! Is it a coincidence, rose tinted glasses or wishful thinking?

Share your next dream regarding your future professional development.
In the dream phase, I am interested in further study, perhaps at the doctorate level in the use of technology within a universal design framework  in special education by RTLB and how it relates to increasing inclusion and collaboration with teachers and parents.
In reality I am looking forward to spending time improving on the learning from my Mindlab experience such as the use of trello to manage workload and planning, maintaining a professional blog, reviewing all the sessions and organising the resources and readings so that I can readily access them. I dream of time to breathe, walk in the forest and spend time at my bach – no internet access there. It has been sadly neglected since November 2015 and I don't regret that at all. 

Canning, C. (1991). What Teachers Say About Reflection. Educational Leadership, 18-21.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.
Dieker, L., Lane, H., Allsopp, D., O'Brien, C., T.W.Butler, Kyger, M., . . . Fenty, N. (May 2009). Evaluating Video Models of Evidence-Based Instructional Practices to Enhance Teacher Learning. Teacher Education and Special Education, Volume 32, Number 2, 180-196.
Osterman, K., & Kottkamp, R. (1993). Reflective Practice for Educators. California: Cornwin Press, Inc. Retrieved June 30, 2016, from http://itslifejimbutnotasweknowit.org.uk/files/RefPract/Osterman Kottkamp extract.pdf

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Four Stages of Competence. Retrieved June 30, 2016, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_stages_of_competence

Saturday, July 2, 2016

APC. 7 Breaking Boundaries ....

 The Interdisciplinary Learning Environment 

“The time has come to realise that an interpretation of the universe—even a positivist one—remains unsatisfying unless it covers the interior as well as the exterior of things; mind as well as matter. The true physics is that which will, one day, achieve the inclusion of man in his wholeness in a coherent picture of the world.” (Chardin, 1955, p. 36)

The very word ‘Interdisciplinary’ brings a rush of memories down through years of study and reading from within two worlds. The world of science and the world of faith.  For the purpose of this post I’m going to frame my reflections and thoughts  with the words of PierreTeilhard de Chardin. At the risk of going off topic my reflections on this post are based on an understanding of knowledge systems and values that were once more holistic and then divided during the Renaissance into two distinct and even opposing bodies of knowledge and in the 20th century have begun the slow and challenging journey back to unity.


Over the last twenty years I have studied at Masters level both education and religion so that the understandings and illumination that I have received from the combining of these two disciplines is the crucible of my reflections in this post. The two greek words symballein and diabellein are fundamental to my understanding of the importance of interdisciplinary work. The dichotomy below shows two ways of approaching knowledge and knowing.  Knowledge that was once unified has become broken into two quite disparate ways of knowing. One has assumed pre- eminence over the years and judgments are made around the quality of knowing and knowledge.
Symballein – whole, symbol
Diabellein – spread apart, broken down
Coming together
Synthesis
Combining
Partnership
Collaboration
Wide focus
Holistic
Generalist
Esoteric
Faith
Belief
Somatic knowing
Intuitive
Analysis
Specialisation
Fragmentation
Narrow focus
Expertise
Factual
Empirical Knowing
Scientific methodology
Rational
Factual
Qualitative research


There is now a global drive and push towards unity and wholeness in every aspect of our lives both personally and professional. The desire for collaboration, social connection and community are fundamental to being human and to be able to prioritise this in our professional world as educators is to give space and place for those aspects of living that support us to be fully alive 

In my work as an Resource Teacher of Learning  (RTLB)it is essential to think holistically for the students in special education as their needs may be physical, emotional, neurological, psychological or intellectual. When multiple disciplines collide in a spirit of understanding and good will there is often an explosion of understanding and new knowledge. (Wiley, 2001). Creativity and innovation are born in either a point of collision or a long brooding phase. Increased innovation comes from increased connectivity.” Chance favours the connected mind.” (Johnson, 2010).





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NugRZGDbPFU  Where good ideas come from

Steven Johnson,  2010


Interdisciplinary, integrated and integrative teaching are separate methods that are unified in that they are all driven by an inquiry approach (Mathison & Freeman, 1997) Interdisciplinary teaching is teacher driven to combine disciplines in order to enhance both disciplines where the specific value of each discipline is usually maintained. Integrated teaching is usually teacher driven and organised around themes or global issues  in comparison to integrative teaching where students and teachers are co-constructers in curriculum design. (Mathison & Freeman, 1997) Skillful and respectful communication is essential for successful interdisciplinary work.

My Professional Disciplinary Map



Working in a More Interdisciplinary Environment
Challenges
Benefits
Time needed for collaboration
Loss of specialisation
Loss of depth of knowledge
Need to have a working knowledge of multiple disciplinary language
Time lost on specialised disciplines
How to evaluate the learning outcomes
How to maintain integrity of each discipline


Opportunities for collision of ideas leading to innovation
Connections to daily realities
Collaboration with diverse peoples
Cognitive dissonance opening doors for new understanding
Global comprehension of interdependence
Improved critical thinking and problem solving
Synthesis of ideas
Development of multiple perspectives
Promotes co-operative learning
Increased motivation
(Jones, 2009) (Mathison & Freeman, 1997)

I work as a collaborative team member in all my casework and this necessarily involves working with other disciplines for the wellbeing of the student. I have experienced all of the challenges and the benefits of interdisciplinary work in the table above at different times. The people involved in interdisciplinary work are the deciding factor on making the work successful by the reciprocity of respect and value that is given to all members of the team from the Principal to the teacher aide. Misunderstandings can easily arise when parents are given inaccurate or misleading information. One example of this is the assumption of a Paediatrician that the RTLB service would provide a teacher aide for a student. When a teacher aide was not forthcoming the parent became vocally upset. When a multi disciplinary team is working well the support for teacher and student becomes evident and powerful changes can take place. 


Chardin, P. T. (1955). The Phenomenon of Man. London: Collins.
Johnson, S. (2010, July 2). Where Good Ideas Come From : The Natural History of Innovation. New York: Riverhead Books a member of Penguain Group (USA) Inc.
Jones, C. (2009). Interdisciplinary approach -Advantages, disadvantages, and the future benefits of interdisciplinary studies. ESSAI, 76-81. Retrieved June 29, 2016, from http://www.albany.edu/cela/reports/mathisonlogic12004.pdf:
Mathison, S., & Freeman, M. (1997). The Logic of Interdisciplinary Studies. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago. Retrieved June 30, 2016, from http://www.albany.edu/cela/reports/mathisonlogic12004.pdf:
TEDx Talks. (2001, April 6). TEDxBYU - David Wiley - An Interdisciplinary Path to Innovation. Retrieved July 1, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ytjDongp4



Friday, July 1, 2016

APC. 6 Using Social Online Networks in Professional Development


APC 6 Using Social Online Networks in Professional Development

“Social networks might be described as a phenomenon of the modern age. There is a plethora of online spaces that aim to make face-to-face social connections visible. The meteoric rise of leviathans such as Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn stand on the shoulders of predecessors such as Friendster, MySpace, SixDegrees.com, LiveJournal and Ryze.com (boyd & Ellison, 2007). This review reflects the way such sites have evolved to become central to contemporary culture and social interaction. So common are they that they are increasingly used to extend professional discussion” (Melhuish, 2013, p. 30)

Current Active Social Media

My professional online social networks cover a range of apps and programmes. Until I was asked to do this activity I had not realised how many social networks I belong to such as Words with Friends - an interactive scrabble game that allows me to play scrabble with my niece in New York and a stranger in Florida who has become a friend over four years of games at one or two words a day and some occasional comments through the internal messenging on the app. I care about her birthday, her family events and she remembers significant personal anniversaries of mine. We are socially connected. I have not included this app in my diagram as it does not fall in the professional online forums. The diagram below shows the social networks that I do use most often in my professional life. It covers most but not all as there is a constant change and new opportunities that respond to specific need at particular times. I use pinterest during non school time to search out craft ideas or activities for English for Speakers of Other Language ( ESOL) and LinkedIn when I am searching for professional colleagues or organisations with specific expertise or information such as a person qualified to diagnose dyscalculia.

Choose two of these questions. 
  1. What are some key features of social media that are beneficial for teaching and learning? Why?
  2. What are potential challenges that teachers need to be aware of when integrating social networking platforms into teaching activities? Why?
  3. What social media platform do you feel best supports engagement with your professional development? Why?
  4. How do/would you use social media to enhance your professional development? Why?
The last two questions are ones prick my interest the most – I love learning, it is why I became a teacher. My own going learning is always of interest to me and I believe that our willingness to engage in learning is one of the best gifts that we can offer the younger generation along with a sense of fun in learning new skills and ways of thinking and working in a changing world.


https://youtu.be/nA1Aqp0sPQo  by Austrialian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership

As a Resource Teacher of Learning and Behaviour I find that skype has a great deal to offer in sharing and meeting for an hour across distance for groups of people who have a relationship and common professional issues. I particpate in a group of 6 RTLB who are all Incredible Years Teacher programme facilitators and we meet in a group call twice a term to share, problem solve and celebrate successes. It is a forum that operates much like a community of practice and yet there is a strong element of peer supervision also as at times we will use a shared framework for problem solving or a De Bono thinking process to problem solve. Each session is specific, targeted and of great value for learning to improve as a facilitator of IYT. We are a group of diverse facilitators who live in different parts of New Zealand from Rotorua, Wellington, Christchurch, Nelson, Whangarei and New Plymouth. We all had social connections prior to the group gathering via skype and although we could engage in face to face COP's with other colleagues, this forum works as a way to manage time, maintain social links and provide quality professional development in a collaborative and trusting environment. All members are comfortable with the technology.

Why is the skype media so successful for us? I am comfortable with the personal notes that I take of our skype calls and relaxed around issues of confidentiality. There is no digital footprint of any shared casework with all attendant practices of not using any identifiable names. The geographic distance adds a safety factor also around sharing as there is very little possibility of members of the skype group recognising local schools or teachers. This further adds to the trust in confidentiality from professional colleagues. 

I have also begun to use Trello as a planning tool for work tasks with a team of colleagues and support from a young entrepreneur who participates by asking questions that make us think more closely about why we are doing things in a particular way. He is often puzzled by how cautiously we work and surprised at the care that the teachers take over making things work well for students. His energy and enthusiasm have been inspirational in getting plans underway and happening when we would have gathered more data, consulted more people. He is coaching us in the use of Trello in an informal agreement to mentor us through effective use of Trello. This is probably one of the more exciting innovations I have begun and I believe that part of this is the cognitive dissonance provided by someone outside of the education profession who brings a fresh pair of eyes and a new perspective to challenges and who asks questions that would never occur to us- what we take for granted is unpacked and looked at more closely to see if it is needed or just how we have become used to doing things.

The primary teachers facebook page is a great tool for a quick brainstorm of ideas or resources when I am stuck for age specific learning in literacy and numeracy for students on my case roll. I find twitter and G+ communities good sources of new ideas and information on a more personal level. There is not the same level of social engagement as with the skype sessions which are usually filled with a mix of laughter and learning. I find myself part of an exponential trend where “The notion of ‘Web 2.0’ seems almost traditional in the face of aggregation tools and multi-platform spaces, intertwined by a proliferation of social networking tools.” Upon reflecting more on my facebook and skype experiences, they could well be represented in the diagram below.



 (Melhuish, 2013, p. 30)

The skype community  and the facebook social network fulfil different functions in my professional development. One allows for deeper and richer levels of openness and vulnerability with corresponding trust in the integrity of participants to deal with highly sensitive issues of competence and ethical challenges. Facebook provides rapid and widespread eclectic  ideas and tips that no one person or small homogenous group could hope to generate.  Both forums offer professional development specific to different needs that in turn have a direct bearing on how effective I can be in my practice and ultimately increase the impact that I have on student achievement.  Ultimately, “Teachers who model good social media use will grow learners who apply positive, respectful values in their interactions on social media platforms. “ (Education Council, 2016).

  

Education Council. (2016, June 18). Education Council and Social Media. Retrieved from Education Council Aotearoa: http://teachersandsocialmedia.co.nz/about-teachers-council-and-social-media-project
Melhuish, K. (2013). Online Social Networking and its impact on New Zealand educator's professional learning. Retrieved June 27, 2016, from The University of Waikato: http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10289/8482/thesis.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y

http://teachersandsocialmedia.co.nz/